Senedd Cymru | Welsh Parliament
Bil Senedd Cymru (Rhestrau Ymgeiswyr Etholiadol)| Senedd Cymru (Electoral Candidate Lists) Bill
Ymateb gan Unigolyn | Evidence from Individual
I do not agree with self-identification. The category of 'woman' should be reserved for biological females. Men-who-think-they-are women should not be able to 'self-identify' into the female category. Therefore, I would reject the bill on that grounds.
I do not agree with self-identification. The category of 'woman' should be reserved for biological females. Men-who-think-they-are women should not be able to 'self-identify' into the female category. Therefore, I would reject the bill on that grounds.
I do not agree with self-identification. The category of 'woman' should be reserved for biological females. Men-who-think-they-are women should not be able to 'self-identify' into the female category. Therefore, I would reject the bill on that grounds.
Yes. The Bill makes a mockery of the biological category of 'woman' by allowing men-who-think-they-are women to 'self-identify' into the female category, thereby denying biological women (real women/actual women) the opportunity that the bill is supposed to be presenting. Therefore, I would reject the bill on that grounds.
The Welsh government does not have the authority to change the definition of 'woman' to 'anyone who thinks they are a woman'. So the Bill will go the same way as the GRR Bill in Scotland and be struck down, thankfully, by saner heads in Westminster.
See previous answer.
Poorly written: self-id into the category of 'woman' is an affront to real women and means the bill will not achieve what it sets out to achieve. When will the Senedd realise that sex is a immutable binary in humans?